122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1732920)
21. [Mammography: American recommendations overhauled].
Hoeffken W
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 123(18):722-4. PubMed ID: 6785617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Breast cancer screening in Gävleborgs County--method, organization, economy].
Lundgren B
Lakartidningen; 1985 Feb; 82(9):714-6. PubMed ID: 3982172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Brief history of mammography in Hungary and its development until the present day].
Székely M
Orv Hetil; 1999 Feb; 140(6):297-9. PubMed ID: 10071510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [75th anniversary of the first mammography].
Semiglazov VF; Vesnin AG
Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 2648679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography: methodology and early observations. 1966.
Shapiro S; Strax P; Venet L
CA Cancer J Clin; 1990; 40(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2106369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Mammography in the Edinburgh breast screening project.
Milne L
Radiography; 1979 Aug; 45(536):176-8. PubMed ID: 504619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Hi-tech breast-cancer screening: will it deliver?
Senior K
Lancet; 2000 May; 355(9217):1796. PubMed ID: 10832837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective.
Fletcher SW
Epidemiol Rev; 2011; 33():165-75. PubMed ID: 21697257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Specimen radiography and the diagnosis of clinically occult mammary carcinoma. A brief historical review.
Rosen PP
Pathol Annu; 1980; 15(Pt 1):225-37. PubMed ID: 7003511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Significance of mammography and xeroradiography in the early diagnosis of breast carcinoma].
Lutterbeck EF
Zentralbl Chir; 1972 Jun; 97(22):713-9. PubMed ID: 4341038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Response to Kopans.
Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New apparatus for mass screening in mammography.
Strax P; Oppenheim A
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1968 Apr; 102(4):941-5. PubMed ID: 5643221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France].
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone].
Scherz N
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Indications mammography--preventive mammography].
Hasert V
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1991 Apr; 85(7):293-300. PubMed ID: 2063591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present.
Joe BN; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2 Suppl):S23-44. PubMed ID: 25340437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Historical technical developments in mammography.
Haus AG
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Apr; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 12622518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
