These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1732928)

  • 21. Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low cost.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3715053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmental Panel.
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):vii-xviii. PubMed ID: 9709265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing effect of mammography screening in a university workplace.
    Champion VL; Skinner CS; Miller AM; Goulet RJ; Wagler K
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 9167040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality assurance for screening mammography data collection systems in 22 countries.
    Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Broeders M; Thoresen S; Rodrigues VJ; Ballard-Barbash R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):528-41. PubMed ID: 11758297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
    McCue P
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.
    Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of universal screening mammography. Lessons from a community intervention.
    Costanza ME; D'Orsi CJ; Greene HL; Gaw VP; Karellas A; Zapka JG
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 151(9):1851-6. PubMed ID: 1888252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subsidizing screening mammography through induced revenues and profits.
    Krug H
    Radiol Manage; 1990; 12(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 10108487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low-cost mass screening for breast cancer with mammography.
    Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 1727358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Low-cost screening mammography.
    Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):430-1; author reply 431-2. PubMed ID: 1307858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases.
    Bird RE
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 2494683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 7724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Costs of achieving high patient compliance after recall from screening mammography.
    Blane CE; Pinsky RW; Joe AI; Pichan AE; Blajan MR; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):894-6. PubMed ID: 17377019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low-cost screening mammography.
    North C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):431; author reply 431-2. PubMed ID: 1632375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Strategies for implementation and quality assurance for mammographic screening.
    DeBruhl ND; Farria DM; Bassett LW
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct; 4(5):155-9. PubMed ID: 1343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening.
    Monticciolo DL; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):751-3. PubMed ID: 2119104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A radiologist's perspective on efficiency and economics in a quality breast center.
    Wagner RO
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 20392640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.