407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329519)
1. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.
Declercq E; Barger M; Cabral HJ; Evans SR; Kotelchuck M; Simon C; Weiss J; Heffner LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 17329519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies.
Galyean AM; Lagrew DC; Bush MC; Kurtzman JT
J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):726-30. PubMed ID: 19626026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery.
Liu S; Heaman M; Joseph KS; Liston RM; Huang L; Sauve R; Kramer MS;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 15802414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative economic implications of initial method of delivery.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):549-55. PubMed ID: 16946214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twin vaginal birth after cesarean.
Wax JR; Philput C; Mather J; Steinfeld JD; Ingardia CJ
Conn Med; 2000 Apr; 64(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 10812766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery.
Geller EJ; Wu JM; Jannelli ML; Nguyen TV; Visco AG
Am J Perinatol; 2010 Oct; 27(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 20235001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery.
Kennare R; Tucker G; Heard A; Chan A
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):270-6. PubMed ID: 17267823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies.
Daltveit AK; Tollånes MC; Pihlstrøm H; Irgens LM
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1327-34. PubMed ID: 18515516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 16948717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Visco AG; Viswanathan M; Lohr KN; Wechter ME; Gartlehner G; Wu JM; Palmieri R; Funk MJ; Lux L; Swinson T; Hartmann K
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 17138788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal health outcomes two years after term breech delivery.
Molkenboer JF; Debie S; Roumen FJ; Smits LJ; Nijhuis JG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Apr; 20(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 17437240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
