193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1732961)
1. Renal lesions: controlled comparison between CT and 1.5-T MR imaging with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH techniques.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Kroeker MA; MacMahon RG; Greenberg HM
Radiology; 1992 Feb; 182(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses.
Semelka RC; Hricak H; Stevens SK; Finegold R; Tomei E; Carroll PR
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 1994422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bowel disease: prospective comparison of CT and 1.5-T pre- and postcontrast MR imaging with T1-weighted fat-suppressed and breath-hold FLASH sequences.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Silverman R; Kroeker MA; Yaffe CS; Micflikier AB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 1823167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.
Semelka RC; Kroeker MA; Shoenut JP; Kroeker R; Yaffe CS; Micflikier AB
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):785-91. PubMed ID: 1947098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT.
Yamashita Y; Honda S; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 8615260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Magro CM; Kroeker MA; MacMahon R; Greenberg HM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 8347952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hypervascular malignant liver lesions: comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT.
Larson RE; Semelka RC; Bagley AS; Molina PL; Brown ED; Lee JK
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):393-9. PubMed ID: 8029403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced rapid acquisition spin echo MR imaging.
Eilenberg SS; Brown JJ; Lee JK; Heiken JP; Mirowitz SA
Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 11(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 8423725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Islet cell tumors: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.
Semelka RC; Cumming MJ; Shoenut JP; Magro CM; Yaffe CS; Kroeker MA; Greenberg HM
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 8381551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre-and postcontrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging, with histologic correlation.
Semelka RC; Lawrence PH; Shoenut JP; Heywood M; Kroeker MA; Lotocki R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 8428108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spleen: dynamic enhancement patterns on gradient-echo MR images enhanced with gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Lawrence PH; Greenberg HM; Madden TP; Kroeker MA
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):479-82. PubMed ID: 1410358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging.
Guthrie JA; Ward J; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8888221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Kroeker MA; Greenberg HM; Simm FC; Minuk GY; Kroeker RM; Micflikier AB
Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):687-94. PubMed ID: 1324509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Solitary hepatic metastasis: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with fat-suppressed T2-weighted, breath-hold T1-weighted FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH sequences.
Semelka RC; Shoenut JP; Ascher SM; Kroeker MA; Greenberg HM; Yaffe CS; Micflikier AB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 8061428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal lesion characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: efficacy and safety in patients with renal insufficiency.
Rofsky NM; Weinreb JC; Bosniak MA; Libes RB; Birnbaum BA
Radiology; 1991 Jul; 180(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 2052729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
