116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329681)
1. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy.
Saar B; Meining A; Beer A; Settles M; Helmberger H; Frimberger E; Rummeny EJ; Rösch T
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):235-41. PubMed ID: 17329681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality.
Saar B; Gschossmann JM; Bonel HM; Kickuth R; Vock P; Netzer P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT
Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience.
Lauenstein TC; Ajaj W; Kuehle CA; Goehde SC; Schlosser TW; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2005 Feb; 40(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15654253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.
Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Zoepf T; Nuefer M; Grabellus F; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Gut; 2007 Aug; 56(8):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17341542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study.
Saar B; Heverhagen JT; Obst T; Berthold LD; Kopp I; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Invest Radiol; 2000 Sep; 35(9):521-6. PubMed ID: 10981995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography.
So NM; Lam WW; Mann D; Leung KL; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2003 Jul; 58(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 12834640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Langhorst J; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 16736477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions.
Acay MB; Bayramoğlu S; Acay A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience.
Schreyer AG; Gölder S; Scheibl K; Völk M; Lenhart M; Timmer A; Schölmerich J; Feuerbach S; Rogler G; Herfarth H; Seitz J
Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2005 Apr; 11(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 15803030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
