116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329681)
21. Virtual endoscopic colonography based on 3D MRI.
Luboldt W; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 9922186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals.
Leung WK; Lam WW; Wu JC; So NM; Fung SS; Chan FK; To KF; Yeung DT; Sung JJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jan; 99(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 14687150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Feasibility and potential of MR-Colonography for evaluating colorectal cancer.
Meier Ch; Wildermuth S
Swiss Surg; 2002; 8(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 11883342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incidental extracolonic findings on bright lumen MR colonography in a population at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma.
Yusuf E; Florie J; Nio CY; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Baak L; Stoker J
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 19836916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intravenous, contrast-enhanced MR colonography using air as endoluminal contrast agent: impact on colorectal polyp detection.
Keeling AN; Morrin MM; McKenzie C; Farrell RJ; Sheth SG; Ngo L; Bloch BN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 21131152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dark-lumen MR colonography.
Ajaj W; Debatin JF; Lauenstein T
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 14716455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.
Luboldt W; Steiner P; Bauerfeind P; Pelkonen P; Debatin JF
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9530299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients.
White TJ; Avery GR; Kennan N; Syed AM; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18462241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Holst Andersen LP; Klein M; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):790-7. PubMed ID: 19375956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.
Florie J; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; Birnie E; Lavini C; Reitsma JB; Stoker J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):766-74. PubMed ID: 17340636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance colonography vs computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an indirect comparison.
Purkayastha S; Athanasiou T; Tekkis PP; Constantinides V; Teare J; Darzi AW
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Feb; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17223933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging.
Achiam MP; Løgager VB; Chabanova E; Eegholm B; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2009 Jul; 34(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 18452023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study.
Pohl J; Nguyen-Tat M; Pech O; May A; Rabenstein T; Ell C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 103(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18070234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.
Zhang S; Peng JW; Shi QY; Tang F; Zhong MG
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Oct; 13(40):5371-5. PubMed ID: 17879409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
