185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329686)
1. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients.
White TJ; Avery GR; Kennan N; Syed AM; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18462241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies.
Florie J; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; Birnie E; Lavini C; Reitsma JB; Stoker J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):766-74. PubMed ID: 17340636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy.
Cohnen M; Vogt C; Beck A; Andersen K; Heinen W; vom Dahl S; Aurich V; Haeussinger D; Moedder U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1355-9. PubMed ID: 15505303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.
Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Zoepf T; Nuefer M; Grabellus F; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Gut; 2007 Aug; 56(8):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17341542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions.
Acay MB; Bayramoğlu S; Acay A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [State of the art of MR colonoscopy].
Lauenstein TC; Rühm SG; Debatin JF
Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 12635009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.
Yee J; Akerkar GA; Hung RK; Steinauer-Gebauer AM; Wall SD; McQuaid KR
Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 11376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.
Luboldt W; Steiner P; Bauerfeind P; Pelkonen P; Debatin JF
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9530299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy.
Spada C; Hassan C; Munoz-Navas M; Neuhaus H; Deviere J; Fockens P; Coron E; Gay G; Toth E; Riccioni ME; Carretero C; Charton JP; Van Gossum A; Wientjes CA; Sacher-Huvelin S; Delvaux M; Nemeth A; Petruzziello L; de Frias CP; Mayershofer R; Amininejad L; Dekker E; Galmiche JP; Frederic M; Johansson GW; Cesaro P; Costamagna G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):581-589.e1. PubMed ID: 21601200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
