185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329686)
21. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: Influence on image quality and patient acceptance.
Liedenbaum MH; Denters MJ; de Vries AH; van Ravesteijn VF; Bipat S; Vos FM; Dekker E; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):W31-7. PubMed ID: 20566777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Pfeiffer B; Jakobs R; Eickhoff A; Riemann JF; Layer G
Endoscopy; 2005 Sep; 37(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 16116531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A prospective comparison of video colonoscopy and CT colonography in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal cancer].
Juchems M; Römpp A; Kestler HA; Ernst A; Brambs HJ; Adler G; Aschoff A; Wagner M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Aug; 135(34-35):1656-61. PubMed ID: 20721840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Meshed capillary vessels found on narrow-band imaging without optical magnification effectively identifies colorectal neoplasia: a North American validation of the Japanese experience.
Henry ZH; Yeaton P; Shami VM; Kahaleh M; Patrie JT; Cox DG; Peura DA; Emura F; Wang AY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 20381799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Left-sided polyps detected at screening CT colonography: do we need complete optical colonoscopy for further evaluation?
Pickhardt PJ; Durick NA; Pooler BD; Hassan C
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 21357518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study.
Brenner H; Chang-Claude J; Jansen L; Seiler CM; Hoffmeister M
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 22910933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Park MJ; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Jang KM; Rhim H
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 21846762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with positive family history of colorectal cancer.
Charalambopoulos A; Syrigos KN; Ho JL; Murday VA; Leicester RJ
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1991-4. PubMed ID: 10928139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]