185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329686)
41. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies.
Zijta FM; Bipat S; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2010 May; 20(5):1031-46. PubMed ID: 19936754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography.
Lam WW; Leung WK; Wu JK; So NM; Sung JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Virtual reality in MR colonography].
Schoenfelder D; Debatin JF
Radiologe; 2000 Mar; 40(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 10789128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Yun JY; Ro HJ; Park JB; Choi JB; Chung JE; Kim YJ; Suh WH; Lee JK
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 18071278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA; Maccarty RL; Welch TJ; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Gastroenterology; 2003 Aug; 125(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 12891530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Magnetic resonance colonography with automated carbon dioxide insufflation: Diagnostic accuracy and distension.
van der Paardt MP; Zijta FM; Boellaard TN; Jensch S; Baak LC; Depla AC; Dekker E; Nederveen AJ; Bipat S; Stoker J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):743-50. PubMed ID: 24560199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Van Gelder RE; Nio CY; Florie J; Bartelsman JF; Snel P; De Jager SW; Van Deventer SJ; Laméris JS; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Gastroenterology; 2004 Jul; 127(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15236170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy.
Saar B; Meining A; Beer A; Settles M; Helmberger H; Frimberger E; Rummeny EJ; Rösch T
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):235-41. PubMed ID: 17329681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Learning curve of virtual chromoendoscopy for the prediction of hyperplastic and adenomatous colorectal lesions: a prospective 2-center study.
Neumann H; Vieth M; Fry LC; Günther C; Atreya R; Neurath MF; Mönkemüller K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jul; 78(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 23528656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images.
Jensch S; van Gelder RE; Florie J; Thomassen-de Graaf MA; Lobé JV; Bossuyt PM; Bipat S; Nio CY; Stoker J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):W249-55. PubMed ID: 17312031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers.
Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Kim DH; Reichelderfer M; Gopal DV; Pfau PR
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):417-25. PubMed ID: 16982816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Halligan S; Marmo R
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 21415247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia.
Singh R; Jayanna M; Navadgi S; Ruszkiewicz A; Saito Y; Uedo N
Dig Endosc; 2013 May; 25 Suppl 2():16-20. PubMed ID: 23617643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study.
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 17185666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study.
Saar B; Heverhagen JT; Obst T; Berthold LD; Kopp I; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Invest Radiol; 2000 Sep; 35(9):521-6. PubMed ID: 10981995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.
Lauenstein T; Holtmann G; Schoenfelder D; Bosk S; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 11566681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. MR colonography without bowel cleansing or water enema: a pilot study.
Sambrook A; Mcateer D; Yule S; Phull P
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):921-4. PubMed ID: 22167505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
