BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17329946)

  • 1. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
    Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Surgical treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine].
    Aniuliene R; Stankeviciene A; Kacerauskiene J; Aniulis P; Druktenyte V
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 19605963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Harris MB; Olive DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. PubMed ID: 8059810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey.
    Inal ZO; Inal HA
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 May; 187(2):485-491. PubMed ID: 28726032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.
    Malur S; Possover M; Schneider A
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 11344431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.
    Ottosen C; Lingman G; Ottosen L
    BJOG; 2000 Nov; 107(11):1380-5. PubMed ID: 11117766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
    Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].
    Debodinance P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Apr; 30(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 11319467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach.
    Mäkinen J; Johansson J; Tomás C; Tomás E; Heinonen PK; Laatikainen T; Kauko M; Heikkinen AM; Sjöberg J
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1473-8. PubMed ID: 11425832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy in a primary care hospital setting.
    Washington JL
    JSLS; 2005; 9(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16121874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.
    Wesol A; Woolley S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
    Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.