265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17330762)
21. [The development and application of lie detection in forensic science].
Wang L; Yang L; Ge Y; Cai JF; Chang YF; Lan LM
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 24(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 18979922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: an individual difference approach using fMRI.
Ganis G; Morris RR; Kosslyn SM
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):539-53. PubMed ID: 18925536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study.
Bhatt S; Mbwana J; Adeyemo A; Sawyer A; Hailu A; Vanmeter J
Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 18848742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Law & psychiatry: The new lie detectors: neuroscience, deception, and the courts.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2007 Apr; 58(4):460-2. PubMed ID: 17412845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of stimulus similarity between the probe and the irrelevant items during a card-playing deception detection task: the "irrelevants" are not irrelevant.
Marchand Y; Inglis-Assaff PC; Lefebvre CD
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(7):686-701. PubMed ID: 23883278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of intention to conceal in the P300-based concealed information test.
Kubo K; Nittono H
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 19499325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.
Phan KL; Magalhaes A; Ziemlewicz TJ; Fitzgerald DA; Green C; Smith W
Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 15721593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
Schauer F
Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The production and detection of deception in an interactive game.
Sip KE; Lynge M; Wallentin M; McGregor WB; Frith CD; Roepstorff A
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3619-26. PubMed ID: 20727906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the p300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: task demand effects.
Meixner JB; Haynes A; Winograd MR; Brown J; Peter Rosenfeld J
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 19543970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception.
Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes C; Farrow TF; Wilkinson ID
Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1411-8. PubMed ID: 18308586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
Schauer F
Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Polygraphy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lie Detection: A Controlled Blind Comparison Using the Concealed Information Test.
Langleben DD; Hakun JG; Seelig D; Wang AL; Ruparel K; Bilker WB; Gur RC
J Clin Psychiatry; 2016 Oct; 77(10):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 26794034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.
Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS
Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simultaneous ERP and event-related fMRI: focus on the time course of brain activity in target detection.
Mulert C; Jäger L; Pogarell O; Bussfeld P; Schmitt R; Juckel G; Hegerl U
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2002; 24 Suppl D():17-20. PubMed ID: 12575464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A novel countermeasure against the reaction time index of countermeasure use in the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information.
Sokolovsky A; Rothenberg J; Labkovsky E; Meixner J; Rosenfeld JP
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jul; 81(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 21440013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
