BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17331805)

  • 1. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Angrisani L; Lorenzo M; Borrelli V
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(2):127-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 17331805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized trial.
    Angrisani L; Cutolo PP; Formisano G; Nosso G; Vitolo G
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 23453785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic gastric bypass is superior to adjustable gastric band in super morbidly obese patients: A prospective, comparative analysis.
    Bowne WB; Julliard K; Castro AE; Shah P; Morgenthal CB; Ferzli GS
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 16847241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass: single-institution, 5-year experience in bariatric surgery.
    Jan JC; Hong D; Bardaro SJ; July LV; Patterson EJ
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2007; 3(1):42-50; discussion 50-1. PubMed ID: 17241936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes for super-super obese (BMI > or =60 kg/m2) patients undergoing weight loss surgery at a high-volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and open tubular gastric bypass.
    Stephens DJ; Saunders JK; Belsley S; Trivedi A; Ewing DR; Iannace V; Capella RF; Wasielewski A; Moran S; Schmidt HJ; Ballantyne GH
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 18243060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience.
    Weiner R; Blanco-Engert R; Weiner S; Matkowitz R; Schaefer L; Pomhoff I
    Obes Surg; 2003 Jun; 13(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 12841906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients.
    Mognol P; Chosidow D; Marmuse JP
    Obes Surg; 2004; 14(10):1349-53. PubMed ID: 15603650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    van Wageningen B; Berends FJ; Van Ramshorst B; Janssen IF
    Obes Surg; 2006 Feb; 16(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 16469213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An update on 73 US obese pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comorbidity resolution and compliance data.
    Nadler EP; Youn HA; Ren CJ; Fielding GA
    J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Jan; 43(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 18206472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility and technique of laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy.
    Dapri G; Cadière GB; Himpens J
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2009; 5(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 19161936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the super-obese: a comparative study of 290 patients.
    Mognol P; Chosidow D; Marmuse JP
    Obes Surg; 2005 Jan; 15(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 15760503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    Sanchez BR; Mohr CJ; Morton JM; Safadi BY; Alami RS; Curet MJ
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2005; 1(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 16925289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch.
    Dapri G; Cadière GB; Himpens J
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2009; 5(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 19767245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.
    van Dielen FM; Soeters PB; de Brauw LM; Greve JW
    Obes Surg; 2005 Oct; 15(9):1292-8. PubMed ID: 16259890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super-obesity-weight loss versus side effects.
    Laurenius A; Taha O; Maleckas A; Lönroth H; Olbers T
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2010; 6(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 20655023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.
    Carandina S; Maldonado PS; Tabbara M; Valenti A; Rivkine E; Polliand C; Barrat C
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2014; 10(6):1085-91. PubMed ID: 25066441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conversion of failed gastric banding into four different bariatric procedures.
    Abu-Gazala S; Keidar A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2012; 8(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 21937286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taste change after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
    Tichansky DS; Boughter JD; Madan AK
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2006; 2(4):440-4. PubMed ID: 16925376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?
    Moon RC; Teixeira AF; Jawad MA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 23769112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome analysis of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. The first 116 cases.
    Papasavas PK; Hayetian FD; Caushaj PF; Landreneau RJ; Maurer J; Keenan RJ; Quinlin RF; Gagné DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Dec; 16(12):1653-7. PubMed ID: 12239643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 159.