These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333069)

  • 1. [Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine].
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bock B; Bergmann G
    Orthopade; 2007 Mar; 36(3):205-6, 208-11. PubMed ID: 17333069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of position and height of a mobile core type artificial disc on the biomechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bock B; Bergmann G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Feb; 222(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 18441758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):738-43. PubMed ID: 15803074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute.
    Noailly J; Lacroix D; Planell JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(20):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16227887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study.
    Tang S; Rebholz BJ
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 21311928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
    Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Biomechanical analysis of artificial intervertebral disc in a 3-dimensional finite-element model].
    Ge L; Li KH
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Nov; 33(11):1041-6. PubMed ID: 19060373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
    Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
    Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of disc prosthesis position on segmental motion in the lumbar spine].
    Weisskopf M; Maus U; Ohnsorge JA; Prescher A; Pandorf T; Birnbaum K
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 20135599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of annular incision type on the change in biomechanical properties in a herniated lumbar intervertebral disc.
    Natarajan RN; Andersson GB; Patwardhan AG; Verma S
    J Biomech Eng; 2002 Apr; 124(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 12002133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nucleus implant parameters significantly change the compressive stiffness of the human lumbar intervertebral disc.
    Joshi A; Mehta S; Vresilovic E; Karduna A; Marcolongo M
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 16060361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Spiral Nucleus Implant Parameters on the Compressive Biomechanics of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc.
    Du CF; Liu CJ; Huang YP; Wang X
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e878-e884. PubMed ID: 31733385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Zhang QH; Teo EC
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Dec; 30(10):1246-56. PubMed ID: 18804398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation.
    Ezquerro F; Simón A; Prado M; Pérez A
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 14644594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.