These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333073)
1. [A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry]. Schreiber W; Vorwerk CK; Langenbucher A; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A Ophthalmologe; 2007 Apr; 104(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17333073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes]. Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Munkwitz S; Elkarmouty A; Hoffmann EM; Pfeiffer N; Thieme H Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 246(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 18196259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects. Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study. Achiron A; Blumenfeld O; Avizemer H; Karmona L; Leybowich G; Man V; Bartov E; Burgansky-Eliash Z J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):822-828. PubMed ID: 27871779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare]. Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Pourjavan S; Charlier L; Dethinne B; Huge L; Ledoux A J Fr Ophtalmol; 2006 Dec; 29(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 17211320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of precision of the TonoPenXL with the Goldmann and Draeger applanation tonometer in a sitting and recumbent position of the patients -- a clinical study on 251 eyes]. Viestenz A; Lausen B; Jünemann AM; Mardin CY Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Nov; 219(11):785-90. PubMed ID: 12494368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry]. Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Three Methods of Tonometry in Patients with Inactive Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy. Karhanová M; Kalitová J; Malušková M; Schovánek J; Zapletalová J; Mlčák P; Marešová K Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2023; 79(6):318-323. PubMed ID: 38086704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]