BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333179)

  • 1. Accuracy of 3D acquisition mode for myocardial FDG PET studies using a BGO-based scanner.
    van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 34(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 17333179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
    Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 18F-FDG PET for detecting myocardial viability: validation of 3D data acquisition.
    Brogsitter C; Grüning T; Weise R; Wielepp P; Lindner O; Körfer R; Burchert W
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 46(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15632028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner.
    Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scatter Correction with Combined Single-Scatter Simulation and Monte Carlo Simulation Scaling Improved the Visual Artifacts and Quantification in 3-Dimensional Brain PET/CT Imaging with
    Magota K; Shiga T; Asano Y; Shinyama D; Ye J; Perkins AE; Maniawski PJ; Toyonaga T; Kobayashi K; Hirata K; Katoh C; Hattori N; Tamaki N
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2020-2025. PubMed ID: 28646012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Myocardial FDG-PET examination during fasting and glucose loading states by means of a one-day protocol.
    Tsuchida T; Sadato N; Yonekura Y; Sugimoto K; Nakano A; Lee JD; Takahashi N; Waki A; Ishii Y; Itoh H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 11758948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
    Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
    Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
    Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.
    Visvikis D; Griffiths D; Costa DC; Bomanji J; Ell PJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1050-6. PubMed ID: 15846487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
    El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
    Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of maximum likelihood and conventional PET scatter scaling methods for
    Bal H; Kiser JW; Conti M; Bowen SL
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4218-4228. PubMed ID: 34013586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scatter-corrected list-mode reconstruction and a practical scatter/random approximation technique for dynamic PET imaging.
    Cheng JC; Rahmim A; Blinder S; Camborde ML; Raywood K; Sossi V
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2089-106. PubMed ID: 17404457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of optimized injection dose and acquisition time using body mass index for three-dimensional whole-body FDG-PET].
    Matsumoto K; Matsuura H; Minota E; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Senda M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1564-73. PubMed ID: 15568009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.
    Vandervoort E; Sossi V
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 18334435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of 3-Dimensional PET Systems for Accurate Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow.
    Renaud JM; Yip K; Guimond J; Trottier M; Pibarot P; Turcotte E; Maguire C; Lalonde L; Gulenchyn K; Farncombe T; Wisenberg G; Moody J; Lee B; Port SC; Turkington TG; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 58(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 27539843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plane-dependent ML scatter scaling: 3D extension of the 2D simulated single scatter (SSS) estimate.
    Rezaei A; Salvo K; Vahle T; Panin V; Casey M; Boada F; Defrise M; Nuyts J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6515-6531. PubMed ID: 28737163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reduction of radiation exposure in PET examinations by data acquisition in the 3D mode].
    Brix G; Adam LE; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Nosske D; Doll J
    Nuklearmedizin; 1999 Apr; 38(3):75-9. PubMed ID: 10320992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of scatter correction in 3D PET using different scatter-level approximations.
    Polycarpou I; Thielemans K; Manjeshwar R; Aguiar P; Marsden PK; Tsoumpas C
    Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 25(9):643-9. PubMed ID: 21751085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of quantitative accuracy of the post-injection transmission-based and transmissionless attenuation correction techniques in neurological FDG-PET.
    Kaneko K; Kuwabara Y; Sasaki M; Koga H; Abe K; Baba S; Hayashi K; Honda H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1095-102. PubMed ID: 15577587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.