These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1733351)

  • 1. An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer.
    Schmid HP; McNeal JE
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 Feb; 16(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 1733351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Systematic morphometry of radical prostatectomy samples. A guideline for general practice].
    Schmid HP; McNeal JE; Redwine EA; Freiha FS; Stamey TA
    Helv Chir Acta; 1992 Oct; 59(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 1464544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of a map in radical prostatectomy specimen allows visual estimation of tumor volume.
    Bettendorf O; Oberpenning F; Köpke T; Heinecke A; Hertle L; Boecker W; Semjonow A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 33(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.
    Epstein JI; Carmichael M; Partin AW; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1993 Jun; 149(6):1478-81. PubMed ID: 8501792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
    Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serum prostate-specific antigen and the biologic progression of prostate cancer.
    Kabalin JN; McNeal JE; Johnstone IM; Stamey TA
    Urology; 1995 Jul; 46(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 7541589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens in routine clinical practice.
    Renshaw AA; Chang H; D'Amico AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jun; 107(6):704-8. PubMed ID: 9169669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in prostatic adenocarcinoma tumor volume by visual estimation in prostatectomy specimens.
    Green IF; Black AD; Anchala PR; Catelona WJ; Dimov ND; Yang XJ; Zynger DL
    Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Oct; 208(10):578-83. PubMed ID: 22906433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relation between prostate gland volume and some histological markers of malignancy].
    González-Enguita C; Fernández-Aceñero MJ; García-Cardoso JV; López-Pérez L; Manzarbeitia F; Vela-Navarrete R
    Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Feb; 36(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 22188751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D modelling of radical prostatectomy specimens: Developing a method to quantify tumor morphometry for prostate cancer risk prediction.
    Hovens MC; Lo K; Kerger M; Pedersen J; Nottle T; Kurganovs N; Ryan A; Peters JS; Moon D; Costello AJ; Corcoran NM; Hong MKH
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Dec; 213(12):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 29033190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kryvenko ON; Gupta NS; Virani N; Schultz D; Gomez J; Amin A; Lane Z; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 23627451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
    Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total submission of pelvic lymphadenectomy tissues removed during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer increases lymph node yield and detection of micrometastases.
    Perry-Keene J; Ferguson P; Samaratunga H; Nacey JN; Delahunt B
    Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 24118022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
    Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Lee JS; Chung BH
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative histological analysis of needle biopsy specimens, prostatectomized specimens and metastatic lymph nodes in prostatic adenocarcinoma--on the basis of the WHO histological classification].
    Kondo I; Miura T; Fujinami K; Satomi Y; Ida T; Ishizuka E; Uemura H; Noguchi S; Kubota Y; Hosaka M; Harada M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Feb; 43(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9086343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.