384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333577)
1. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
Mortimer D
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue.
Budds B
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):757-82. PubMed ID: 16514784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
Biagi KG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Taking the least of you: most of us have tissue or blood samples on file somewhere, whether we know it or not. What we don't typically know is what research they are being used for or how much money is being made from them. And science may want to keep things that way.
Skloot R
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Apr; ():38-45, 75, 79, 81. PubMed ID: 16715570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biotechnology: a challenge for Hippocrates.
Huynen S
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1991; 6(4):534-51. PubMed ID: 16127862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Moore revisited: state-sponsored biotechnological research and the takings clause.
Orlando M
Whittier Law Rev; 2001; 23(2):437-65. PubMed ID: 12774777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A question of property rights in the human body.
Marusyk RW; Swain MS
Ottawa Law Rev; 1989; 21(2):351-86. PubMed ID: 16086463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotechnology and the legal constitution of the self: managing identity in science, the market, and society.
Kahn J
Hastings Law J; 2000 Jul; 51(5):909-52. PubMed ID: 12171097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
LoBiondo AR
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Human property: threat or saviour?
Taylor R
E Law; 2002 Dec; 9(4):E4. PubMed ID: 16903023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology.
Nelkin D; Andrews L
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):30-9. PubMed ID: 11656768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Owning the secret of life: biotechnology and property rights revisited.
Yelpaala K
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):111-219. PubMed ID: 15709267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The recognition of proprietary rights in human tissue in common law jurisdictions.
Magnusson RS
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 18():601-29. PubMed ID: 16523581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
Hartman RG
J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1986; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Living tissue and organ donors and property law: more on Moore.
Dickens BM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():73-93. PubMed ID: 10183665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology.
Gold R
San Diego Law Rev; 1995; 32(4):1167-247. PubMed ID: 11656846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.
Murray TH
IRB; 1986; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsors' fears.
Allen MD
IRB; 2004; 26(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 15658012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
