282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333942)
21. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The significance of in-vitro tests with respect to testing of substances for carcinogenic activities (author's transl)].
Schramm T; Teichmann B; Butschak G
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(6):567-80. PubMed ID: 415699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of 5-azacytidine on somatic mutation in a soybean test system.
Katoh Y; Maekawa M; Sano Y
Mutat Res; 1993 Jun; 300(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7683768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the bioluminescence assays as screens for genotoxic chemicals.
Elmore E; Fitzgerald MP
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():379-87. PubMed ID: 2371306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genotoxicity effect of nitrobenzene on soybean (Glycine max) root tip cells.
Guo D; Ma J; Li R; Guo C
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):1030-4. PubMed ID: 20303656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The proportions of mutagens among chemicals in commerce.
Zeiger E; Margolin BH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 11067778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Study of the possibilities of using a short-term test system in vitro for detection of potential mutagens (carcinogens)].
Domshlak MG; Sanotskiĭ IV; Serebrianyĭ AM
Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1989; (11):47-9. PubMed ID: 2515120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Mutagenicity testing for chemical risk assessment: update of the WHO/IPCS Harmonized Scheme.
Eastmond DA; Hartwig A; Anderson D; Anwar WA; Cimino MC; Dobrev I; Douglas GR; Nohmi T; Phillips DH; Vickers C
Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 19535363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of cancer potency using a battery of mutation and toxicity data.
Travis CC; Saulsbury AW; Pack SA
Mutagenesis; 1990 May; 5(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 2385175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The challenge of testing chemicals for potential carcinogenicity using multiple short-term assays: an analysis of a proposed test battery for hair dyes.
Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham SL; Mermelstein R; Cunningham AR
Mutat Res; 2007 Sep; 633(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 17625954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Aubrecht J; Kleinjans JC; Ahr HJ
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18822359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrophilicity of nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens as measured by the ke test.
Bakale G; McCreary RD
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():355-65. PubMed ID: 2371305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
Kirkland D; Speit G
Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The mutagenic and carcinogenic activity of chemical compounds].
Rakitskiĭ VN; Turusov VS
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2005; (3):7-9. PubMed ID: 15852703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The carcinogenic and genotoxic action of the substances in the exhaust gases from internal combustion engines].
Makhover MS; Khesina AIa
Eksp Onkol; 1990; 12(5):11-4, 34. PubMed ID: 1699721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Structure-activity relationship studies of chemical mutagens and carcinogens: mechanistic investigations and prediction approaches.
Benigni R
Chem Rev; 2005 May; 105(5):1767-800. PubMed ID: 15884789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Mathematical parameters for quantification of mutational responses in bacteria.
Roldán-Arjona T; Pueyo C; Haynes RH
Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 346(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 7885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. IPCS harmonization of methods for the prediction and quantification of human carcinogenic/mutagenic hazard, and for indicating the probable mechanism of action of carcinogens.
Ashby J; Waters MD; Preston J; Adler ID; Douglas GR; Fielder R; Shelby MD; Anderson D; Sofuni T; Gopalan HN; Becking G; Sonich-Mullin C
Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 352(1-2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8676904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
