250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17333982)
1. Evaluation of the marginal seal of CEREC 3D restorations using two different luting agents.
Jahangiri L; Agosta C; Estafan D
Gen Dent; 2007; 55(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 17333982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
Browning WD; Safirstein J
Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro microleakage of CAD/CAM restorations cemented with a microfilled composite cement.
Hembree JH; Puckett A; Hines R
Miss Dent Assoc J; 1997; 53(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 9573781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period.
Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of porcelain and composite machined crowns cemented with self-adhesive or conventional resin cement.
Ghazy M; El-Mowafy O; Roperto R
J Prosthodont; 2010 Oct; 19(7):523-30. PubMed ID: 20723014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
