These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17335150)

  • 1. Simplified calculations using likelihood ratios.
    Sotos JG
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A10. PubMed ID: 17335150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios.
    Perera R; Heneghan C
    ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A8-9. PubMed ID: 17335149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.
    Deeks JJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):168-9. PubMed ID: 15258077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic likelihood ratios].
    Capron L
    Rev Prat; 2000 Nov; 50(17):1865-9. PubMed ID: 11151325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 2). Clinical application and usefulness of a diagnostic test].
    Cifuentes L; Cerda J
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Aug; 27(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 21046715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter by Hoaglin: Heterogeneity in likelihood ratios.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():262-3. PubMed ID: 26130493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likelihood ratio reporting.
    Kohn MA; Michaels AD
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Apr; 80(4):563; author reply 563-4. PubMed ID: 15819297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations.
    Roy A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):150-73. PubMed ID: 19127473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence.
    Deeks JJ
    Ann Oncol; 1999 Jul; 10(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 10470421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A primer on measures of treatment effectiveness and diagnostic test performance.
    Katz DA
    WMJ; 1999; 98(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10235061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary on "propagation of uncertainty in bayesian diagnostic test interpretation".
    Frisch LE; Morrison K
    South Med J; 2012 Sep; 105(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 22948323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards evidence-based diagnosis in developing countries: the use of likelihood ratios for robust quick diagnosis.
    Soltani A; Moayyeri A
    Ann Saudi Med; 2006; 26(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 16861864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood ratio reporting.
    Foote RS; Siegel A
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Apr; 80(4):564-5; author reply 565. PubMed ID: 15819298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter to the Editor on Cohen et al. (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:299-306).
    Hoaglin DC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():261-2. PubMed ID: 26142918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 18582626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing.
    Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2335-45. PubMed ID: 18407894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Two issues were simplified.
    ter Riet G; Kessels AG; Bachmann LM
    BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7322):1188. PubMed ID: 11794254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
    Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.