131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17335405)
1. A comparative study of root coverage using acellular dermal matrix with and without enamel matrix derivative.
Shin SH; Cueva MA; Kerns DG; Hallmon WW; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Nunn ME
J Periodontol; 2007 Mar; 78(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 17335405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession.
Cueva MA; Boltchi FE; Hallmon WW; Nunn ME; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Rees T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):949-56. PubMed ID: 15341352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone.
Woodyard JG; Greenwell H; Hill M; Drisko C; Iasella JM; Scheetz J
J Periodontol; 2004 Jan; 75(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 15025216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treating human gingival recession defects with acellular dermis matrix and enamel matrix derivative using coronally advanced flaps.
Wallace SC
Gen Dent; 2014; 62(2):e12-5. PubMed ID: 24598503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of Class I gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Côrtes Ade Q; Martins AG; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Sallum EA
J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1137-44. PubMed ID: 15455743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Healing of localized gingival recessions treated with a coronally advanced flap alone or combined with an enamel matrix derivative and a porcine acellular dermal matrix: a preclinical study.
Shirakata Y; Sculean A; Shinohara Y; Sena K; Takeuchi N; Bosshardt DD; Noguchi K
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1791-800. PubMed ID: 26612398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acellular dermal matrix for mucogingival surgery: a meta-analysis.
Gapski R; Parks CA; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1814-22. PubMed ID: 16274299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel to a coronally positioned flap approach.
Papageorgakopoulos G; Greenwell H; Hill M; Vidal R; Scheetz JP
J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1022-30. PubMed ID: 18533779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
