These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17336224)
1. Prostate volume contouring: a 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR. Smith WL; Lewis C; Bauman G; Rodrigues G; D'Souza D; Ash R; Ho D; Venkatesan V; Downey D; Fenster A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1238-47. PubMed ID: 17336224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prostate volume, shape, and contouring variability determined from preimplant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images. Liu D; Usmani N; Ghosh S; Kamal W; Pedersen J; Pervez N; Yee D; Danielson B; Murtha A; Amanie J; Sloboda RS Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 22197014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of CT and MR-CT fusion for prostate post-implant dosimetry. Maletz KL; Ennis RD; Ostenson J; Pevsner A; Kagen A; Wernick I Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1912-7. PubMed ID: 21550183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of combined x-ray radiography and magnetic resonance (XMR) imaging-versus computed tomography-based dosimetry for the evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants. Acher P; Rhode K; Morris S; Gaya A; Miquel M; Popert R; Tham I; Nichol J; McLeish K; Deehan C; Dasgupta P; Beaney R; Keevil SF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1518-25. PubMed ID: 18513881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation. McLaughlin PW; Narayana V; Drake DG; Miller BM; Marsh L; Chan J; Gonda R; Winfield RJ; Roberson PL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 12377321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Dubois DF; Prestidge BR; Hotchkiss LA; Prete JJ; Bice WS Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):785-9. PubMed ID: 9609905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods. Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry. Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. Parker CC; Damyanovich A; Haycocks T; Haider M; Bayley A; Catton CN Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 12648794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. Rasch C; Barillot I; Remeijer P; Touw A; van Herk M; Lebesque JV Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 9989514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. vOARiability: Interobserver and intermodality variability analysis in OAR contouring from head and neck CT and MR images. Podobnik G; Ibragimov B; Peterlin P; Strojan P; Vrtovec T Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2175-2186. PubMed ID: 38230752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. Debois M; Oyen R; Maes F; Verswijvel G; Gatti G; Bosmans H; Feron M; Bellon E; Kutcher G; Van Poppel H; Vanuytsel L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):857-65. PubMed ID: 10571190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of CT imaging for postplan quality assessment in prostate brachytherapy. Petrik D; Araujo C; Kim D; Halperin R; Crook JM Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 22732323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetric analysis of prostate brachytherapy. Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Sakurai K; Nakano M; Maeda S; Kajita K; Deguchi T; Hoshi H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 16966002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy. Solhjem MC; Davis BJ; Pisansky TM; Wilson TM; Mynderse LA; Herman MG; King BF; Geyer SM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 15465193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT- and MRI-based seed localization in postimplant evaluation after prostate brachytherapy. De Brabandere M; Al-Qaisieh B; De Wever L; Haustermans K; Kirisits C; Moerland MA; Oyen R; Rijnders A; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 23876358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric impact of contouring and image registration variability on dynamic Westendorp H; Surmann K; van de Pol SMG; Hoekstra CJ; Kattevilder RAJ; Nuver TT; Moerland MA; Slump CH; Minken AW Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):572-578. PubMed ID: 28242194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer: contouring target and organs at risk by kilovoltage and megavoltage CT and MRI in patients with and without hip prostheses. Falcinelli L; Palumbo I; Radicchia V; Arcidiacono F; Lancellotta V; Montesi G; Matrone F; Zucchetti C; Marcantonini M; Bini V; Aristei C Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150509. PubMed ID: 26462970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of CBCT-based target and normal structure delineation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: multi-observer and image multi-modality study. Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Fotina I; Stock M; Pötter R; Goldner G; Georg D Radiother Oncol; 2011 Feb; 98(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 21176984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter- and intra-observer variability in prostate definition with tissue harmonic and brightness mode imaging. Sandhu GK; Dunscombe P; Meyer T; Pavamani S; Khan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):e9-16. PubMed ID: 21489703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]