These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17337005)

  • 1. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands.
    Kahraman A; Morris RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Apr; 368(1):283-301. PubMed ID: 17337005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conformational diversity of ligands bound to proteins.
    Stockwell GR; Thornton JM
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 356(4):928-44. PubMed ID: 16405908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria.
    Peters KP; Fauck J; Frömmel C
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
    Henrich S; Salo-Ahen OM; Huang B; Rippmann FF; Cruciani G; Wade RC
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
    Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.
    Kawabata T; Go N
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):516-29. PubMed ID: 17444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of protein functional surfaces by the concept of a split pocket.
    Tseng YY; Li WH
    Proteins; 2009 Sep; 76(4):959-76. PubMed ID: 19326458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Architectural repertoire of ligand-binding pockets on protein surfaces.
    Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Chembiochem; 2010 Mar; 11(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 20069621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volatile anesthetic binding to proteins is influenced by solvent and aliphatic residues.
    Streiff JH; Jones KA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2066-73. PubMed ID: 18808106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel computational analysis of ligand-induced conformational changes in the ATP binding sites of cyclin dependent kinases.
    Subramanian J; Sharma S; B-Rao C
    J Med Chem; 2006 Sep; 49(18):5434-41. PubMed ID: 16942017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method.
    Hamelberg D; McCammon JA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(24):7683-9. PubMed ID: 15198616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation of ligand-protein binding.
    Clark M; Guarnieri F; Shkurko I; Wiseman J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):231-42. PubMed ID: 16426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres.
    Kim D; Cho CH; Cho Y; Ryu J; Bhak J; Kim DS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Apr; 26(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 18023220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 2. Molecular docking using quadratic shape descriptors (QSDock).
    Goldman BB; Wipke WT
    Proteins; 2000 Jan; 38(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 10651041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding.
    Perola E; Charifson PS
    J Med Chem; 2004 May; 47(10):2499-510. PubMed ID: 15115393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selected-fit versus induced-fit protein binding: kinetic differences and mutational analysis.
    Weikl TR; von Deuster C
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 18798570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context shapes: Efficient complementary shape matching for protein-protein docking.
    Shentu Z; Al Hasan M; Bystroff C; Zaki MJ
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):1056-73. PubMed ID: 17847098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.