These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17337213)

  • 41. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Stagg CJ; Nitsche MA
    Neuroscientist; 2011 Feb; 17(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 21343407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Finite element analysis of gradient z-coil induced eddy currents in a permanent MRI magnet.
    Li X; Xia L; Chen W; Liu F; Crozier S; Xie D
    J Magn Reson; 2011 Jan; 208(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 21106418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An efficient 3-D eddy-current solver using an independent impedance method for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    De Geeter N; Crevecoeur G; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 20959261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Bikson M; Rahman A; Datta A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 43(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 22956646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Numerical calculation of eddy currents in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychiatric treatment.
    Sekino M; Ueno S
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():88. PubMed ID: 16012627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bio-heat transfer model of transcranial DC stimulation: comparison of conventional pad versus ring electrode.
    Datta A; Elwassif M; Bikson M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():670-3. PubMed ID: 19964238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Theoretical investigation of transcranial alternating current stimulation using laminar model.
    Lopes S; Davies N; Toumazou C; Grossman N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4152-5. PubMed ID: 23366842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
    Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A reconstruction of the conductive phenomena elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue.
    Toschi N; Welt T; Guerrisi M; Keck ME
    Phys Med; 2008 Jun; 24(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 18296093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of the different winding methods of coil on electromagnetic field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Yang S; Xu G; Wang L; Zhang X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4270-3. PubMed ID: 19163656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An implanted spherical head model exposed to electromagnetic fields at a mobile communication frequency.
    Reyhani SM; Ludwig SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2092-101. PubMed ID: 17019874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction.
    Sparing R; Mottaghy FM
    Methods; 2008 Apr; 44(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 18374276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex.
    Nitsche MA; Niehaus L; Hoffmann KT; Hengst S; Liebetanz D; Paulus W; Meyer BU
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Oct; 115(10):2419-23. PubMed ID: 15351385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue: clinical impact on focality, reproducibility and true sham stimulation.
    Toschi N; Welt T; Guerrisi M; Keck ME
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 18514227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling of RF head exposure in children.
    Wiart J; Hadjem A; Gadi N; Bloch I; Wong MF; Pradier A; Lautru D; Hanna VF; Dale C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S19-30. PubMed ID: 16142772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children.
    Christ A; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S31-44. PubMed ID: 16142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Simulation of head-gradient-coil induced electric fields in a human model.
    Feldman RE; Odegaard J; Handler WB; Chronik BA
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Dec; 68(6):1973-82. PubMed ID: 22294352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation--a transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans.
    Sparing R; Dafotakis M; Meister IG; Thirugnanasambandam N; Fink GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 17804023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.
    Grant PF; Lowery MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.