These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1733879)

  • 1. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Nielsen SL; Fogh-Andersen N; Golman K; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM; Foster WL; Halvorsen RA; Dunnick NR; Rommel AJ; Bates M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tubular nephrotoxicity after intravenous urography with ionic high-osmolal and nonionic low-osmolal contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
    Cavaliere G; Arrigo G; D'Amico G; Bernasconi P; Schiavina G; Dellafiore L; Vergnaghi D
    Nephron; 1987; 46(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 2885767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effects of nonionic (iopamidol) and ionic (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) contrast media for urography on urinary excretion of water and solutes.
    Garibotto G; Saffioti S; Garlaschi G; Gambaro A; Satragno L; Cittadini G
    Urol Radiol; 1986; 8(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 3798605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
    Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; Woods WT; Womack KA; Katholi CR; McCann WP; Moses HW; Dove JT; Mikell FL; Woodruff RC
    Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iopamidol in urography. A comparison between ionic and nonionic contrast media in patients with normal and impaired renal function.
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Urol Radiol; 1982; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7101596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media.
    Nauert C; Mützel W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One or two samples for determination of total plasma clearance of a nonionic contrast medium in patients undergoing enhanced CT.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Golman K; Dorph S
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):588-91. PubMed ID: 1449886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plasma osmolality, iodine concentration and urographic images following high and low osmolar contrast media.
    Todd AW; Naisby GP; Owen JP; Smith PA; Butler TJ; Kelly PJ; Murthy LN; Robson JY; Laker MF
    Clin Radiol; 1991 May; 43(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2036759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Apr; 43(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 1373337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does dilution of contrast media affect contrast enhancement? An experimental study in rats.
    Dean PB; Kivisaari L; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S118-21. PubMed ID: 3198330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.