These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339207)

  • 1. Under neutrality, Q(ST) < or = F(ST) when there is dominance in an island model.
    Goudet J; Martin G
    Genetics; 2007 Jun; 176(2):1371-4. PubMed ID: 17339207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The joint effects of selection and dominance on the QST - FST contrast.
    Santure AW; Wang J
    Genetics; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-76. PubMed ID: 18984567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.
    Goudet J; Büchi L
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1337-47. PubMed ID: 16322514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary inference from QST.
    Whitlock MC
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(8):1885-96. PubMed ID: 18363667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. F(ST) and Q(ST) under neutrality.
    Miller JR; Wood BP; Hamilton MB
    Genetics; 2008 Oct; 180(2):1023-37. PubMed ID: 18780742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1627-33. PubMed ID: 12930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular and quantitative genetic divergence among populations of house mice with known evolutionary histories.
    Morgan TJ; Evans MA; Garland T; Swallow JG; Carter PA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 May; 94(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 15741999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST.
    Whitlock MC; Guillaume F
    Genetics; 2009 Nov; 183(3):1055-63. PubMed ID: 19687138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The genetic differentiation at quantitative trait loci under local adaptation.
    Le Corre V; Kremer A
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(7):1548-66. PubMed ID: 22332667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. If F(ST) does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with Q(ST) is misleading. Or is it?
    Edelaar P; Björklund M
    Mol Ecol; 2011 May; 20(9):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21410574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons between Q(ST) and F(ST) --how wrong have we been?
    Edelaar P; Burraco P; Gomez-Mestre I
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Dec; 20(23):4830-9. PubMed ID: 22060729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: comparison of Q(ST) and F(ST) at two spatial scales.
    Volis S; Yakubov B; Shulgina I; Ward D; Mendlinger S
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Dec; 95(6):466-75. PubMed ID: 16189543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of quantitative and molecular genetic variation of native vs. invasive populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L., Lythraceae).
    Chun YJ; Nason JD; Moloney KA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(14):3020-35. PubMed ID: 19548895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multilocus models in the infinite island model of population structure.
    Roze D; Rousset F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Jun; 73(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 18442836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Q(ST) < F(ST) As a signature of canalization.
    Lamy JB; Plomion C; Kremer A; Delzon S
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Dec; 21(23):5646-55. PubMed ID: 23110372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dynamic deterministic model to optimize a multiple-trait selection scheme.
    Costard AD; Vitezica ZG; Moreno CR; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):885-94. PubMed ID: 19028846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons for natural populations meaningful?
    Pujol B; Wilson AJ; Ross RI; Pannell JR
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(22):4782-5. PubMed ID: 19140971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid.
    Hua J; Xing Y; Wu W; Xu C; Sun X; Yu S; Zhang Q
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(5):2574-9. PubMed ID: 12604771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: an application to Pinus sylvestris.
    Waldmann P; García-Gil MR; Sillanpää MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jun; 94(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 15940273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.