BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339389)

  • 21. Student evaluation of clickers in a combined dental and dental hygiene periodontology course.
    Satheesh KM; Saylor-Boles CD; Rapley JW; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1321-9. PubMed ID: 24098036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Everyone's answering: using technology to increase classroom participation.
    Filer D
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 20882867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
    Wait KR; Cloud BA; Forster LA; Jones TM; Nokleby JJ; Wolfe CR; Youdas JW
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 19764082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audience response techniques for 21st century radiology education.
    Richardson ML
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):834-41. PubMed ID: 24833568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Livening up the classroom: using audience response systems to promote active learning.
    Collins LJ
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2007; 26(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17210552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.
    DiVall MV; Hayney MS; Marsh W; Neville MW; O'Barr S; Sheets ED; Calhoun LD
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2013 May; 77(4):75. PubMed ID: 23716743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing biology majors from large lecture classes with TA-facilitated laboratories to those from small lecture classes with faculty-facilitated laboratories.
    Goodman BE; Koster KL; Redinius PL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 15905156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education.
    Johnson JT
    J Dent Educ; 2005 Mar; 69(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 15749949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the effect of a clicker in an information literacy course for college nursing students in Taiwan.
    Lin KY
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2015 Mar; 33(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 25636038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audience response made easy: using personal digital assistants as a classroom polling tool.
    Menon AS; Moffett S; Enriquez M; Martinez MM; Dev P; Grappone T
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 14764615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Remember the days in the old school yard: from lectures to online learning.
    Reynolds PA; Mason R; Eaton KA
    Br Dent J; 2008 Apr; 204(8):447-51. PubMed ID: 18438380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Issues in teaching and learning at a distance: changing roles and responsibilities of administrators, faculty, and students.
    Billings DM
    Comput Nurs; 1997; 15(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9099024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acceptance of clickers in a large multimodal biochemistry class as determined by student evaluations of teaching: Are they just an annoying distraction for distance students?
    Miles NG; Soares da Costa TP
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016; 44(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 26515808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Putting practice into teaching: an exploratory study of nursing undergraduates' interpersonal skills and the effects of using empirical data as a teaching and learning resource.
    Aled J
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2297-307. PubMed ID: 18036120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.
    Eddy SL; Converse M; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(2):14:ar23. PubMed ID: 26033871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of an audience response system in teaching pharmacology to baccalaureate nursing students.
    Vana KD; Silva GE; Muzyka D; Hirani LM
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jun; 29(6):326-34; quiz 335-6. PubMed ID: 20978436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
    Harris ST; Zeng X
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.