These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339392)

  • 1. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.
    Preszler RW; Dawe A; Shuster CB; Shuster M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 17339392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Student perspectives on curricular change: lessons from an undergraduate lower-division biology core.
    Casem ML
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 17012192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses.
    Smith AC; Stewart R; Shields P; Hayes-Klosteridis J; Robinson P; Yuan R
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15917873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.
    Crossgrove K; Curran KL
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 18316817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. University and student segmentation: multilevel latent-class analysis of students' attitudes towards research methods and statistics.
    Mutz R; Daniel HD
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Jun; 83(Pt 2):280-304. PubMed ID: 23692536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anticipation of Personal Genomics Data Enhances Interest and Learning Environment in Genomics and Molecular Biology Undergraduate Courses.
    Weber KS; Jensen JL; Johnson SM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133486. PubMed ID: 26241308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Students' studying and approaches to learning in introductory biology.
    Tomanek D; Montplaisir L
    Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 15592598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Despite Similar Perceptions and Attitudes, Postbaccalaureate Students Outperform in Introductory Biology and Chemistry Courses.
    Shortlidge EE; Rain-Griffith L; Shelby C; Shusterman GP; Barbera J
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 18(1):ar3. PubMed ID: 30681902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of discovery learning in a lower-division biology course.
    Wilke RR; Straits WJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2001 Dec; 25(1-4):134-41. PubMed ID: 11824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered.
    Elliott ER; Reason RD; Coffman CR; Gangloff EJ; Raker JR; Powell-Coffman JA; Ogilvie CA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27252298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the effectiveness of the studio format in introductory undergraduate biology.
    Montelone BA; Rintoul DA; Williams LG
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18519615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the Role of an Inquiry-Based Biology Lab Course on Student Attitudes and Views toward Science.
    Jeffery E; Nomme K; Deane T; Pollock C; Birol G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27856549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
    Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplemental instruction in introductory biology I: enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students.
    Rath KA; Peterfreund AR; Xenos SP; Bayliss F; Carnal N
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 17785403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes.
    Colbert JT; Olson JK; Clough MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17339393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal Study of Student Attitudes in a Biology Program.
    Hansen MJ; Birol G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 26086663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.