266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339411)
1. Across-breed adjustment factors for expected progeny differences for carcass traits.
Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 17339411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of selection for ultrasound intramuscular fat percentage in Angus bulls on carcass traits of progeny.
Sapp RL; Bertrand JK; Pringle TD; Wilson DE
J Anim Sci; 2002 Aug; 80(8):2017-22. PubMed ID: 12211367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sire breed solutions for growth traits adjusted by mean expected progeny differences to a 1993 base.
Barkhouse KL; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Buchanan DS; Marshall DM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2287-93. PubMed ID: 9781484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National cattle evaluation system for combined analysis of carcass characteristics and indicator traits recorded by using ultrasound in Angus cattle.
MacNeil MD; Northcutt SL
J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2518-24. PubMed ID: 18539834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and product quality of progeny from Red Angus sires divergent for maintenance energy EPD.
Welch CM; Ahola JK; Hall JB; Murdoch GK; Crews DH; Davis LC; Doumit ME; Price WJ; Keenan LD; Hill RA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5107-17. PubMed ID: 22871930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic parameters for EUROP carcass traits within different groups of cattle in Ireland.
Hickey JM; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Cromie AR; Veerkamp RF
J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 17235018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of breed of sire on carcass composition and sensory traits of lamb.
Shackelford SD; Leymaster KA; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2012 Nov; 90(11):4131-9. PubMed ID: 22665668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Simmental carcass EPD estimated using live and carcass data.
Crews DH; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL
J Anim Sci; 2004 Mar; 82(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 15032422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic evaluation of beef carcass data using different endpoint adjustments.
Rumph JM; Shafer WR; Crews DH; Enns RM; Lipsey RJ; Quaas RL; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2007 May; 85(5):1120-5. PubMed ID: 17224467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal breed of sire effects on postweaning performance of heifer and steer progeny: postweaning growth and carcass characteristics.
Urick JJ; Reynolds WL; Knapp BW
J Anim Sci; 1991 Nov; 69(11):4377-87. PubMed ID: 1752813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Across-breed expected progeny differences: use of within-breed expected progeny differences to adjust breed evaluations for sire sampling and genetic trend.
Notter DR; Cundiff LV
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4763-76. PubMed ID: 1808173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of carcass price fluctuations on genetic and economic evaluation of carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
Ibi T; Kahi AK; Hirooka H
J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3204-11. PubMed ID: 17093212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Live animal measurements, carcass composition and plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations in male progeny of sires differing in genetic merit for beef production.
Clarke AM; Drennan MJ; McGee M; Kenny DA; Evans RD; Berry DP
Animal; 2009 Jul; 3(7):933-45. PubMed ID: 22444813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracies of DNA-based estimates of genetic merit derived from Angus or multibreed beef cattle training populations.
Weber KL; Drake DJ; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ; Kuehn LA; Thallman RM; Schnabel RD; Snelling WM; Pollak EJ; Van Eenennaam AL
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4191-202. PubMed ID: 22871929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of reciprocal differences in Bos indicus x Bos taurus backcross calves produced through embryo transfer: II. Postweaning, carcass, and meat traits.
Amen TS; Herring AD; Sanders JO; Gill CA
J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 17235022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bovine sire selection based on maintenance energy affects muscle fiber type and meat color of F1 progeny.
Thornton KJ; Welch CM; Davis LC; Doumit ME; Hill RA; Murdoch GK
J Anim Sci; 2012 May; 90(5):1617-27. PubMed ID: 22147475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic parameters for measures of energetic efficiency of bulls and their relationships with carcass traits of field progeny in Japanese Black cattle.
Hoque MA; Hosono M; Oikawa T; Suzuki K
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 18765855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breed comparisons for growth traits adjusted for within-breed genetic trend using expected progeny differences.
Núñez-Dominguez R; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8325800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic parameters for growth and carcass traits of Brahman steers.
Smith T; Domingue JD; Paschal JC; Franke DE; Bidner TD; Whipple G
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1377-84. PubMed ID: 17339417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
