307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339634)
1. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
Anisimova M; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
Yang Z; dos Reis M
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.
Zhang J
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15014150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Purifying selection and positive selection on the myxovirus resistance gene in mammals and chickens.
Hou ZC; Xu GY; Su Z; Yang N
Gene; 2007 Jul; 396(1):188-95. PubMed ID: 17467195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of insertions, deletions, and alignment errors on the branch-site test of positive selection.
Fletcher W; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Oct; 27(10):2257-67. PubMed ID: 20447933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of phylogenetic uncertainty on the detection of positive Darwinian selection.
Pie MR
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2274-8. PubMed ID: 16971694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test a clade in phylogenetic trees.
Shi X; Gu H; Field C
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):1976-83. PubMed ID: 16857857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Control of the false discovery rate applied to the detection of positively selected amino acid sites.
Guindon S; Black M; Rodrigo A;
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):919-26. PubMed ID: 16423864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust inference of positive selection from recombining coding sequences.
Scheffler K; Martin DP; Seoighe C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2493-9. PubMed ID: 16895925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
Laurin M
Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
Scheffler K; Seoighe C
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.
Anisimova M; Gascuel O
Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 16785212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive evolution in the GAF domain of phytochromes in gymnosperms.
Wang J; Yan B; Chen G; Su Y; Wang T
Biochem Genet; 2010 Apr; 48(3-4):236-47. PubMed ID: 19967442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular evolution of the betagamma lens crystallin superfamily: evidence for a retained ancestral function in gamma N crystallins?
Weadick CJ; Chang BS
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 May; 26(5):1127-42. PubMed ID: 19233964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A test for heterotachy using multiple pairs of sequences.
Wu J; Susko E
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 May; 28(5):1661-73. PubMed ID: 21186190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A genetic algorithm approach to detecting lineage-specific variation in selection pressure.
Pond SL; Frost SD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 15509724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient selection of branch-specific models of sequence evolution.
Dutheil JY; Galtier N; Romiguier J; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V; Boussau B
Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):1861-74. PubMed ID: 22319139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new test for detecting recent positive selection that is free from the confounding impacts of demography.
Li H
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):365-75. PubMed ID: 20709734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
