These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17339678)

  • 41. Physicians' opinions about reforming reimbursement: results of a national survey.
    Federman AD; Woodward M; Keyhani S
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Oct; 170(19):1735-42. PubMed ID: 20975020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do physician remuneration schemes matter? The case of Canadian family physicians.
    Devlin RA; Sarma S
    J Health Econ; 2008 Sep; 27(5):1168-81. PubMed ID: 18586341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Physicians' views on pay-for-performance as a reimbursement model: a quantitative study among Dutch surgical physicians.
    Alqasim KM; Ali EN; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
    J Med Econ; 2016; 19(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 26442431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The changing effect of managed care on physician financial incentives.
    Fang H; Rizzo JA
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Oct; 14(10):653-60. PubMed ID: 18837643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Commentary on "Penetrating the 'black box': financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services," by Douglas A. Conrad and Jon B. Christianson.
    Landon BE
    Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):69S-75S. PubMed ID: 15375284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pay-for-performance: whether fad or foundation, doctors must be involved now.
    Natinsky P
    Mich Med; 2005; 104(6):12-6. PubMed ID: 16381251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Individual incentives to fix organizational problems?
    Gray BH
    Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):76S-9S. PubMed ID: 15375285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Provider attitudes toward pay-for-performance programs: development and validation of a measurement instrument.
    Meterko M; Young GJ; White B; Bokhour BG; Burgess JF; Berlowitz D; Guldin MR; Nealon Seibert M
    Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 41(5):1959-78. PubMed ID: 16987311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Will financial incentives stimulate quality improvement? Reactions from frontline physicians.
    Teleki SS; Damberg CL; Pham C; Berry SH
    Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 17077418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Keeping score. Scorecards, profiles and report cards rapidly expanding to track physician performance.
    Glabman M
    Physician Exec; 2005; 31(6):26-31. PubMed ID: 16382648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. "Pay-for-performance" as a quality improvement tool: perceptions and policy recommendations of physicians and program leaders.
    Wharam JF; Frank MB; Rosland AM; Paasche-Orlow MK; Farber NJ; Sinsky C; Rucker L; Rask KJ; Barry MJ; Figaro MK
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2011; 20(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 21725221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Getting real performance out of pay-for-performance.
    Nicholson S; Pauly MV; Wu AY; Murray JF; Teutsch SM; Berger ML
    Milbank Q; 2008 Sep; 86(3):435-57. PubMed ID: 18798885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs in perioperative medicine: are they meeting their goals?
    Lindenauer P
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2009 Nov; 76 Suppl 4():S3-8. PubMed ID: 19880833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Invited Article: Threats to physician autonomy in a performance-based reimbursement system.
    Larriviere DG; Bernat JL
    Neurology; 2008 Jun; 70(24):2338-42. PubMed ID: 18541888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Building blocks to adopting a pay-for-performance model.
    Maffei RM; Turner N; Dunn K
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2008; 10(3):64-9; quiz 70-1. PubMed ID: 18776745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of pay-for-performance on health care quality in Massachusetts, 2001-2003.
    Pearson SD; Schneider EC; Kleinman KP; Coltin KL; Singer JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(4):1167-76. PubMed ID: 18607052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Paying for performance in diagnostic imaging: current challenges and future prospects.
    Seidel RL; Nash DB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):952-6. PubMed ID: 17411737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Incentive implementation in physician practices: A qualitative study of practice executive perspectives on pay for performance.
    Bokhour BG; Burgess JF; Hook JM; White B; Berlowitz D; Guldin MR; Meterko M; Young GJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Feb; 63(1 Suppl):73S-95S. PubMed ID: 16688925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pay for performance and medical education: strategies for preparing physicians of the future.
    Augustine S; Litaker D
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 18425023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Health plan pay-for-performance strategies.
    Trude S; Au M; Christianson JB
    Am J Manag Care; 2006 Sep; 12(9):537-42. PubMed ID: 16961442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.