These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1734043)

  • 1. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.
    O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP
    J Clin Pathol; 1978 Jan; 31(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 342546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of micro-ID with API 20E for identification of Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species.
    Ekwall E; Dimander M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 1(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 6756906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.
    Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the API 20E system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria.
    Shayegani M; Maupin PS; McGlynn DM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):539-45. PubMed ID: 353067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
    Swanson EC; Collins MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.