These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17340672)

  • 1. Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias by Ofer Harel and Xiao-Hua Zhou, Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3769-3786.
    Hanley JA; Dendukuri N; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(15):3046-7; author reply 3047-50. PubMed ID: 17340672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias.
    Harel O; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3769-86. PubMed ID: 16435337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
    de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correcting for partial verification bias: a comparison of methods.
    de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 21109454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data.
    Yu LM; Burton A; Rivero-Arias O
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Jun; 16(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 17621470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of several multiple imputation strategies for repeated measures analysis of clinical scales: to truncate or not to?
    Lipkovich I; Kadziola Z; Xu L; Sugihara T; Mallinckrodt CH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):924-43. PubMed ID: 24697735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Multiple imputation for missing data: a brief introduction].
    Baccini M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(3):162-3. PubMed ID: 18828554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commentary: dealing with measurement error: multiple imputation or regression calibration?
    White IR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1081-2. PubMed ID: 16847023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missing data and multiple imputation.
    Cummings P
    JAMA Pediatr; 2013 Jul; 167(7):656-61. PubMed ID: 23699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extensions of the penalized spline of propensity prediction method of imputation.
    Zhang G; Little R
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 19053998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using multiple imputation methods to estimate relative risks in small EPIC lung cancer subsets.
    Altenburg HP; Agudo A; Berrino F; Boshuizen HC; Bueno-de-Mesquita HB; Janzon L; Le Marchand L; Linseisen J; Lukanova A; Rasmuson T; Vineis P; Riboli E; Miller A;
    IARC Sci Publ; 2002; 156():53-4. PubMed ID: 12484123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates.
    Jeffries NO
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 16971376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple imputation in veterinary epidemiological studies: a case study and simulation.
    Dohoo IR; Nielsen CR; Emanuelson U
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jul; 129():35-47. PubMed ID: 27317321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to account for attrition in longitudinal data: do they work? A simulation study.
    Kristman VL; Manno M; Côté P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 16151878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consequences of handling missing data for treatment response in osteoarthritis: a simulation study.
    Olsen IC; Kvien TK; Uhlig T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Aug; 20(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 22441031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A residuals-based transition model for longitudinal analysis with estimation in the presence of missing data.
    Koru-Sengul T; Stoffer DS; Day NL
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3330-41. PubMed ID: 17124699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missing data and imputation: a practical illustration in a prognostic study on low back pain.
    Vergouw D; Heymans MW; van der Windt DA; Foster NE; Dunn KM; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 22964020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.