These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1734069)
1. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles. Wilson ML; Harrell LJ; Mirrett S; Weinstein MP; Stratton CW; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 1734069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Wilson ML; Harrell LJ; Stratton CW; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):879-82. PubMed ID: 2056053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. Wilson ML; Davis TE; Mirrett S; Reynolds J; Fuller D; Allen SD; Flint KK; Koontz F; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 8463399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of bacteremia by Difco ESP blood culture system. Morello JA; Leitch C; Nitz S; Dyke JW; Andruszewski M; Maier G; Landau W; Beard MA J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 32(3):811-8. PubMed ID: 8195397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Roche Septi-Chek blood culture bottle with a brain heart infusion biphasic medium bottle and with a tryptic soy broth bottle. Henry NK; Grewell CM; McLimans CA; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Mar; 19(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 6371039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults. Wilson ML; Mirrett S; Meredith FT; Weinstein MP; Scotto V; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):983-9. PubMed ID: 11230415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood. Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of simulated candidemia by the BACTEC 9240 system with plus aerobic/F and anaerobic/F blood culture bottles. Horvath LL; Hospenthal DR; Murray CK; Dooley DP J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 41(10):4714-7. PubMed ID: 14532209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. Shigei JT; Shimabukuro JA; Pezzlo MT; de la Maza LM; Peterson EM J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1385-8. PubMed ID: 7615763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles with standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood. Lelièvre H; Gimenez M; Vandenesch F; Reinhardt A; Lenhardt D; Just HM; Pau M; Ausina V; Etienne J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 16(9):669-74. PubMed ID: 9352260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections. Cockerill FR; Reed GS; Hughes JG; Torgerson CA; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Dale JC; Roberts GD; Ilstrup DM; Henry NK J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1469-72. PubMed ID: 9163464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of an agar slide blood culture bottle with tryptic soy broth and a conventional blood culture bottle with supplemented peptone broth. Weinstein MP; Reller LB; Mirrett S; Wang WL; Alcid DV J Clin Microbiol; 1985 May; 21(5):815-8. PubMed ID: 3998116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium. Mirrett S; Petti CA; Woods CW; Magadia R; Weinstein MP; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4581-5. PubMed ID: 15472312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Reimer LG; Feldman RJ; Chuard CR; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2265-70. PubMed ID: 7494013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of the oxoid signal and Roche Septi-Chek blood culture systems. Murray PR; Niles AC; Heeren RL; Curren MM; James LE; Hoppe-Bauer JE J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Dec; 26(12):2526-30. PubMed ID: 3068248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of automated Difco ESP blood culture system with biphasic BBL Septi-Chek system for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients. Welby PL; Keller DS; Storch GA J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1084-8. PubMed ID: 7615710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]