These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17340772)

  • 1. Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
    Joh EE
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2006; 100(2):857-84. PubMed ID: 17340772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
    Juengst ET
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case for national DNA identification cards.
    Quarmby B
    Duke Law Technol Rev; 2003 Jan; ():E1. PubMed ID: 15709289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples.
    Harlan LM
    Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
    Donnan S
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
    Parfett J
    Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.
    Noble AA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic privacy, abandonment, and DNA dragnets: Is Fourth Amendment jurisprudence adequate?
    Fernandez HK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15799497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
    Will JF
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
    Kimel CW
    Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting genetic privacy.
    Annas GJ
    Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):43-44, 46. PubMed ID: 11654493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
    Rosen C
    New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
    Scherer RC
    Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool?
    Hibbert M
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees.
    Kaye DH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 16789942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
    Nerko CJ
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should biological evidence or DNA be retained by forensic science laboratories after profiling? No, except under narrow legislatively-stipulated conditions.
    Gaensslen RE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):375-9. PubMed ID: 16789958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whose DNA is it anyway? European court, junk DNA, and the problem with prediction.
    Sarkar SP; Adshead G
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 20542946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse.
    Herkenham MD
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
    Herlica DA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.