These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17340899)

  • 1. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production.
    Widmann G; Widmann R; Widmann E; Jaschke W; Bale R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17340899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multipurpose navigation system-based concept for surgical template production.
    Widmann G; Widmann R; Stoffner R; Widmann E; Rieger T; Remensberger S; Grubwieser G; Puelacher W; Bale R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):1113-20. PubMed ID: 19375026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
    Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
    Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
    Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image-guided template production.
    Widmann G; Widmann R; Widmann E; Jaschke W; Bale RJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):502-8. PubMed ID: 16117777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model.
    Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Gomez-Roman G; Reinert S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 16164469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a pilot study in 20 patients.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Figl M; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 17974116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides.
    Ganz SD
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 14(1):75-97. PubMed ID: 16522511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II.
    Kero T; Pettersson A; Fäldt J; Andersson M; Gillot L; Cannas B; Näsström K; Söderberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study.
    Nokar S; Moslehifard E; Bahman T; Bayanzadeh M; Nasirpouri F; Nokar A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 21691598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery.
    Widmann G; Stoffner R; Schullian P; Widmann R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Puelacher W; Bale RJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 20556247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided oral implantology: methods and applications.
    Xiaojun C; Yanping L; Yiqun W; Chengtao W
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 17994420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.