331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17340905)
21. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa.
Kim BS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Yi YJ; Lee HJ; Kim SG; Son JS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):e24-8. PubMed ID: 19217009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
Romeo E; Ghisolfi M; Rozza R; Chiapasco M; Lops D
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 17165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants.
Aalam AA; Nowzari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):793-8. PubMed ID: 16274156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical analysis of the soft tissue integration of non-submerged (ITI) and submerged (3i) implants: a prospective-controlled cohort study.
Garcia RV; Kraehenmann MA; Bezerra FJ; Mendes CM; Rapp GE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18828814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: a 1-year prospective study after loading.
Song DW; Lee DW; Kim CK; Park KH; Moon IS
J Periodontol; 2009 Dec; 80(12):1937-44. PubMed ID: 19961377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months.
Tawil G; Younan R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):894-901. PubMed ID: 14696666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial.
den Hartog L; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B; Tymstra N; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1289-97. PubMed ID: 21985286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants.
Tawil G; Aboujaoude N; Younan R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 16634499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16489951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function.
Artzi Z; Carmeli G; Kozlovsky A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16441789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year.
Hall JA; Payne AG; Purton DG; Torr B; Duncan WJ; De Silva RK
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17362495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
