BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17341898)

  • 1. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.
    Markwardt J; Pfeifer G; Eckelt U; Reitemeier B
    Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation.
    Ryu JK; Stern RL; Robinson MG; Bowers MK; Kubo HD; Donald PJ; Rosenthal SA; Fu KK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jun; 32(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 7790248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Plate related complication after mandibular reconstruction].
    Liu SP; Cai ZG; Zhang J; Zhang JG; Zhang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 48(10):586-90. PubMed ID: 24438564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.
    Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Long-term complications associated with immediate plate reconstruction for mandibular defect following tumor-surgery].
    Zhang Y; Zhang J; Yu G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11776905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary mandibular reconstruction: analysis of 64 cases and evaluation of interface radiation dosimetry on bridging plates.
    Gullane PJ
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Jun; 101(6 Pt 2 Suppl 54):1-24. PubMed ID: 2041453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
    Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local and systemic risk factors influencing the long-term success of angular stable alloplastic reconstruction plates of the mandible.
    Kämmerer PW; Klein MO; Moergel M; Gemmel M; Draenert GF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e271-6. PubMed ID: 24296118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate (THORP) system: evaluation of 62 cases.
    Vuillemin T; Raveh J; Sutter F
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1988 Nov; 82(5):804-14. PubMed ID: 3174870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
    Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: has changing technology made a difference?
    Klotch DW; Gal TJ; Gal RL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Oct; 121(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 10504593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Immediate reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor surgery with Ti-plate system].
    Zhang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Jan; 29(1):3-5, 62. PubMed ID: 7995131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Functional dynamic bridging plate and its use in the mandible].
    Krenkel C; Roth SA
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1994; 39():177-80. PubMed ID: 8088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system.
    Suzuki T; Smith WR; Stahel PF; Morgan SJ; Baron AJ; Hak DJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):369-73. PubMed ID: 20502220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Volume-length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates.
    Arden RL; Rachel JD; Marks SC; Dang K
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Jan; 125(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 9932591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Results of the use of titanium mandibular reconstruction plates].
    Coustal B; Michelet V; Pinsolle J; Siberchicot F; Caix P; Michelet FX
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1994; 95(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 7939356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive factors for premature loss of Martin 2.7 mandibular reconstruction plates.
    van der Rijt EE; Noorlag R; Koole R; Abbink JH; Rosenberg AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 53(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 25468318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of small reconstruction plates in vascularized bone graft mandibular reconstruction.
    Farwell DG; Kezirian EJ; Heydt JL; Yueh B; Futran ND
    Head Neck; 2006 Jul; 28(7):573-9. PubMed ID: 16755584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.
    Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 16644232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw osseointegrating reconstruction plate (THORP).
    Koch WM; Yoo GH; Goodstein ML; Eisele DW; Richtsmeier WJ; Price JC
    Laryngoscope; 1994 May; 104(5 Pt 1):545-52. PubMed ID: 8189984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.