BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17342709)

  • 1. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CABS-NMR--De novo tool for rapid global fold determination from chemical shifts, residual dipolar couplings and sparse methyl-methyl NOEs.
    Latek D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Feb; 32(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 20806263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study.
    Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein structure prediction constrained by solution X-ray scattering data and structural homology identification.
    Zheng W; Doniach S
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Feb; 316(1):173-87. PubMed ID: 11829511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein structure prediction based on sequence similarity.
    Jaroszewski L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 569():129-56. PubMed ID: 19623489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing model accuracy using the homology modeling automatically software.
    Bhattacharya A; Wunderlich Z; Monleon D; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2008 Jan; 70(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 17640066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model.
    Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):475-94. PubMed ID: 9726417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies.
    Inbar Y; Benyamini H; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
    Phys Biol; 2005 Nov; 2(4):S156-65. PubMed ID: 16280621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fumarate sensor DcuS: progress in rapid protein fold elucidation by combining protein structure prediction methods with NMR spectroscopy.
    Meiler J; Baker D
    J Magn Reson; 2005 Apr; 173(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 15780923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CASP and CAFASP experiments and their findings.
    Bourne PE
    Methods Biochem Anal; 2003; 44():501-7. PubMed ID: 12647401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Kihara D; Huang YJ; Zheng D; Montelione GT; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):290-306. PubMed ID: 14517980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints.
    Skolnick J; Kolinski A; Ortiz AR
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Jan; 265(2):217-41. PubMed ID: 9020984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology.
    Feig M; Karanicolas J; Brooks CL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 May; 22(5):377-95. PubMed ID: 15099834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PFRES: protein fold classification by using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure.
    Chen K; Kurgan L
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2843-50. PubMed ID: 17942446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PROSPECT-PSPP: an automatic computational pipeline for protein structure prediction.
    Guo JT; Ellrott K; Chung WJ; Xu D; Passovets S; Xu Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Jul; 32(Web Server issue):W522-5. PubMed ID: 15215441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein structure estimation from minimal restraints using Rosetta.
    Rohl CA
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 394():244-60. PubMed ID: 15808223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting disulfide connectivity from protein sequence using multiple sequence feature vectors and secondary structure.
    Song J; Yuan Z; Tan H; Huber T; Burrage K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3147-54. PubMed ID: 17942444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A database method for automated map interpretation in protein crystallography.
    Diller DJ; Redinbo MR; Pohl E; Hol WG
    Proteins; 1999 Sep; 36(4):526-41. PubMed ID: 10450094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel approach for alpha-helical topology prediction in globular proteins: generation of interhelical restraints.
    McAllister SR; Mickus BE; Klepeis JL; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2006 Dec; 65(4):930-52. PubMed ID: 17029234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.