794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17342873)
1. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Clarke SP
Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Algase DL
Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Mohr WK
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(5):239. PubMed ID: 19789000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On ethical peer review and publication: the importance of professional conduct and communication.
Spear HJ
Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 15551686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
Cummings P; Rivara FP
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2002 Jan; 156(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 11772184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
Cintas P
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing critical appraisal skills.
McCaughan D
Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
Koop PP
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
Bugiardini R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer Review: The Science of Nursing Education Depends on It.
Patterson BJ
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(2):75. PubMed ID: 29194129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research.
Marchant S
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tips on writing for a peer-reviewed journal.
Jones JC
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2003 Aug; 41(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 13677005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
