These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17342949)

  • 1. Applying the generalized partitioning principle to control the generalized familywise error rate.
    Xu H; Hsu J
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17342949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 31(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 26985125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partitioning to uncover conditions for permutation tests to control multiple testing error rates.
    Calian V; Li D; Hsu JC
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):756-66. PubMed ID: 18932135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple test procedures using an upper bound of the number of true hypotheses and their use for evaluating high-dimensional EEG data.
    Hemmelmann C; Ziegler A; Guiard V; Weiss S; Walther M; Vollandt R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 18279970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familywise and per-family error rates of multiple comparison procedures.
    Lawrence J
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(19):3586-3598. PubMed ID: 31099904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials.
    Wang B; Ting N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple hypotheses testing based on ordered p values--a historical survey with applications to medical research.
    Hommel G; Bretz F; Maurer W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 21516559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimality of the Holm procedure among general step-down multiple testing procedures.
    Gordon AY; Salzman P
    Stat Probab Lett; 2008 Sep; 78(13):1878-1884. PubMed ID: 19759804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An extended sequential goodness-of-fit multiple testing method for discrete data.
    Castro-Conde I; Döhler S; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2356-2375. PubMed ID: 26265767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling the familywise error rate in widefield optical neuroimaging of functional connectivity in mice.
    White BR; Chan C; Adepoju T; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    Neurophotonics; 2023 Jan; 10(1):015004. PubMed ID: 36756004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Type I and II Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2014 Oct; 153():100-114. PubMed ID: 25092948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.