BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17342955)

  • 1. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Metrika; 2015 Jul; 78(5):563-595. PubMed ID: 26166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple Testing of Gene Sets from Gene Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls.
    Meijer RJ; Goeman JJ
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Sep; 17(5):808-18. PubMed ID: 26446060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiplicity issues in microarray experiments.
    Bretz F; Landgrebe J; Brunner E
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 16113769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.
    Bratton DJ; Parmar MK; Phillips PP; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):309. PubMed ID: 27369182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
    Asomaning N; Archer KJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jun; 56(6):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 22611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An extended sequential goodness-of-fit multiple testing method for discrete data.
    Castro-Conde I; Döhler S; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2356-2375. PubMed ID: 26265767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.