These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Implant solutions for the implant patient: diagnosis and treatment planning for predictable results. Little D Tex Dent J; 2014 Feb; 131(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24745301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures. Almog DM Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Interactive computerized tomography for dental implants. Treatment planning from the prosthetic end result. Tischler M Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):90, 92-3. PubMed ID: 15060916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Ganz SD Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):777-808, vii. PubMed ID: 18805229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Ganz SD Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Angelopoulos C; Aghaloo T Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jan; 55(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 21094723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Restoring the partially edentulous patient in the aesthetic zone: computer-guided implant surgery. Abbo B; Razzoog ME Dent Today; 2007 Jul; 26(7):136, 138-40; quiz 140, 128. PubMed ID: 17708323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report. Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: case report. Wong NY; Huffer-Charchut H; Sarment DP Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17563502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides. Jones PE Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Jacobs R; Quirynen M Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Ganz SD Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):265-90. PubMed ID: 25835793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]