These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17343863)

  • 1. Validation of analytical methods based on accuracy profiles.
    Feinberg M
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1158(1-2):174-83. PubMed ID: 17343863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures. A SFSTP proposal--Part I.
    Hubert P; Nguyen-Huu JJ; Boulanger B; Chapuzet E; Chiap P; Cohen N; Compagnon PA; Dewé W; Feinberg M; Lallier M; Laurentie M; Mercier N; Muzard G; Nivet C; Valat L
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2004 Nov; 36(3):579-86. PubMed ID: 15522533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty profiles for the validation of analytical methods.
    Saffaj T; Ihssane B
    Talanta; 2011 Sep; 85(3):1535-42. PubMed ID: 21807219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of interlaboratory trials based on accuracy profiles.
    Feinberg M; Granier G; Mermet JM
    J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(2):725-33. PubMed ID: 20480921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of the decision efficiency of the accuracy profile by means of a desirability function for analytical methods validation. Application to a diacetyl-monoxime colorimetric assay used for the determination of urea in transdermal iontophoretic extracts.
    Rozet E; Wascotte V; Lecouturier N; Préat V; Dewé W; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    Anal Chim Acta; 2007 May; 591(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 17481415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using tolerance intervals in pre-study validation of analytical methods to predict in-study results. The fit-for-future-purpose concept.
    Rozet E; Hubert C; Ceccato A; Dewé W; Ziemons E; Moonen F; Michail K; Wintersteiger R; Streel B; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1158(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 17420025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of various international guidelines for analytical method validation.
    Chandran S; Singh RS
    Pharmazie; 2007 Jan; 62(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 17294806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Key aspects of analytical method validation and linearity evaluation.
    Araujo P
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Aug; 877(23):2224-34. PubMed ID: 18929516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical analysis of several analytical method validation strategies in the framework of the fit for purpose concept.
    Bouabidi A; Rozet E; Fillet M; Ziemons E; Chapuzet E; Mertens B; Klinkenberg R; Ceccato A; Talbi M; Streel B; Bouklouze A; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 May; 1217(19):3180-92. PubMed ID: 19733857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures: a SFSTP proposal part IV. Examples of application.
    Hubert P; Nguyen-Huu JJ; Boulanger B; Chapuzet E; Cohen N; Compagnon PA; Dewé W; Feinberg M; Laurentie M; Mercier N; Muzard G; Valat L; Rozet E
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Nov; 48(3):760-71. PubMed ID: 18768284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The validation of methods for regulatory purposes in the control of residues.
    Gowik P
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Nov; 1216(46):8051-8. PubMed ID: 19595356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analytical validation in compendium methods].
    Kaniwa N; Matsuda R; Ishibashi M
    Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1993; (111):141-2. PubMed ID: 7920558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of capability indices in the framework of analytical methods validation.
    Bouabidi A; Ziemons E; Marini R; Hubert C; Talbi M; Bouklouze A; Bourichi H; El Karbane M; Boulanger B; Hubert P; Rozet E
    Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Feb; 714():47-56. PubMed ID: 22244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some important considerations for validation of ligand-binding assays.
    Findlay JW
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Aug; 877(23):2191-7. PubMed ID: 19022709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A risk-based analysis of the AAPS conference report on quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation.
    Boulanger B; Rozet E; Moonen F; Rudaz S; Hubert P
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Aug; 877(23):2235-43. PubMed ID: 19577965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach for application to method validation and measurement uncertainty.
    Saffaj T; Ihssane B
    Talanta; 2012 Apr; 92():15-25. PubMed ID: 22385803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-laboratory assessment of method accuracy (trueness and precision) by using validation standards.
    González AG; Herrador MA; Asuero AG
    Talanta; 2010 Oct; 82(5):1995-8. PubMed ID: 20875607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is it really necessary to validate an analytical method or not? That is the question.
    Rambla-Alegre M; Esteve-Romero J; Carda-Broch S
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Apr; 1232():101-9. PubMed ID: 22099221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and analysis of method equivalence studies.
    Borman PJ; Chatfield MJ; Damjanov I; Jackson P
    Anal Chem; 2009 Dec; 81(24):9849-57. PubMed ID: 19925005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tests for robustness of biomedical and pharmaceutical analytic methods].
    Vander Heyden Y
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2003; 65(1):47-73. PubMed ID: 12802896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.