353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17343994)
1. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
Mazur JE
Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
Mazur JE; Biondi DR
J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
Mobini S; Body S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 16050037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.
Mazur JE; Snyderman M; Coe D
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Oct; 11(4):565-75. PubMed ID: 4067510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
Ong EL; White KG
Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 175(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 17034874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
Pitts RC; Febbo SM
Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 9821679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.
Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20438767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
Zentall TR; Stagner JP
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
Grant DS
Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pigeons' discounting of probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
Green L; Myerson J; Calvert AL
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 21451742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Nov; 152(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 11140331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rats' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 25130299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
