BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17345026)

  • 1. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A; Schubring S; Schulz MS; Fuerst M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():105-14. PubMed ID: 17496558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur.
    Fink B
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2014 Oct; 26(5):455-68. PubMed ID: 25261284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach.
    Oinuma K; Eingartner C; Saito Y; Shiratsuchi H
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Aug; 19(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 17728988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis.
    Suominen S; Santavirta S
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1996; 85(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8950449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/conical femoral revision stem.
    Holt G; McCaul J; Jones B; Ingram R; Stark A
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):11. PubMed ID: 21210631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy.
    Breusch SJ; Lukoschek M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Jun; 125(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 15742190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients.
    Parsch D; Jung AW; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17876593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experience of using anterior windowing of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Li H; Lin JH
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 50(5):398-401. PubMed ID: 22883943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables.
    Warren PJ; Thompson P; Fletcher MD
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Dec; 122(9-10):557-60. PubMed ID: 12483345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting.
    Köster G; Walde TA; Willert HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):964-70. PubMed ID: 18534480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty.
    MacDonald SJ; Cole C; Guerin J; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):210-6. PubMed ID: 14646719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral Bone Restoration Patterns in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Distally Fixed Modular Tapered Titanium Stems and an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Approach.
    Ladurner A; Zdravkovic V; Grob K
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2210-2217. PubMed ID: 29599032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isolated acetabular revision hip arthroplasty with the use of uncemented cup.
    Kim YS; Kim YH; Hwang KT; Choi IY
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1236-40. PubMed ID: 19643567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 60.