BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2003 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17345027)

  • 1. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
    Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A; Schubring S; Schulz MS; Fuerst M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():105-14. PubMed ID: 17496558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].
    Friedrich MJ; Gravius S; Schmolders J; Wimmer MD; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):126-40. PubMed ID: 24691908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting.
    Köster G; Walde TA; Willert HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):964-70. PubMed ID: 18534480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/conical femoral revision stem.
    Holt G; McCaul J; Jones B; Ingram R; Stark A
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):11. PubMed ID: 21210631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.
    Wimmer MD; Randau TM; Deml MC; Ascherl R; Nöth U; Forst R; Gravius N; Wirtz D; Gravius S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():19. PubMed ID: 23311769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 101.