BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2005 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17345027)

  • 61. [Eight years experience with the "Erlangen Model" titanium prosthesis--results of cementless implantation of 250 hip prostheses].
    Walther M; Wölfel R; Koerfgen HP; Kessler C
    Zentralbl Chir; 1993; 118(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 8342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Femoral revision with a primary cementless stem.
    Gastaud O; Cambas PM; Tabutin J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26874449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Early results of revision hip arthroplasty using modular Restoration stem].
    Nikratowicz P; Woźniak W; Kluczyński M; Wierusz-Kozłowska M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2011; 76(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 22420181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
    Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50].
    Busch VJ; Gardeniers JW; Slooff TJ; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1935-40. PubMed ID: 17907545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy.
    Breusch SJ; Lukoschek M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Jun; 125(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 15742190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Veth RP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1918-22. PubMed ID: 17907541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].
    Wirtz DC; Niethard FU
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):270-80. PubMed ID: 9381761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Chandler H; Clark J; Murphy S; McCarthy J; Penenberg B; Danylchuk K; Roehr B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):67-74. PubMed ID: 8118997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Patel JV; Masonis JL; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 12629600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Total hip replacement through a minimally invasive, anterolateral approach with the patient supine.
    Roth A; Venbrocks RA
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Dec; 19(5-6):442-57. PubMed ID: 18071930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Conservative femoral stem revision: avoiding therapeutic escalation.
    Pinaroli A; Lavoie F; Cartillier JC; Neyret P; Selmi TA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18534426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Femur revision prosthesis].
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(6):574-7. PubMed ID: 8310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Two-stage reimplantation with an application spacer and combined with delivery of antibiotics in the management of prosthetic joint infection.
    Thabe H; Schill S
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):78-100. PubMed ID: 17345028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.
    Schmolders J; Friedrich MJ; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Strauss AC; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 25277762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Cemented femoral revision: technique and outcome.
    Nelson CL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Apr; 31(4):187-9. PubMed ID: 12008847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision.
    Mallory TH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):47-60. PubMed ID: 3416541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. First-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone with a cemented Exeter stem: radiostereometric analysis of stem migration over nine years.
    Zampelis V; Ornstein E; Franzén H; Atroshi I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 21586771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
    Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
    Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 101.