These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Nobel Laureate David Baltimore would be leaving the Rockefeller University. Anderson C Nature; 1992 May; 357(6375):184. PubMed ID: 1589009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research. Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hibben was not proved guilty of misconduct. Yates TL Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Michigan gets an expensive lesson. Anderson C Science; 1993 Oct; 262(5130):23. PubMed ID: 8211122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is science really a pack of lies? Nature; 1983 Jun; 303(5916):361-2. PubMed ID: 11653465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nobelist caught up in fraud case resigns as head of Rockefeller U. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 Dec; ():A1, C8. PubMed ID: 11646894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The False Claims Act: litigating scientific misconduct II. Sherman S Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(3):248. PubMed ID: 9182306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Academic accused of living on borrowed lines. Abbott A Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7154):632-3. PubMed ID: 17687290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Whatever made them do it? Estling R New Sci; 1995 Jan; 145(1961):48-9. PubMed ID: 11656388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. as Seeburg faces misconduct inquiry. Abbott A Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):512. PubMed ID: 10376587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research. Andrews LB Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The plutonium experiment. Welsome E Albuq Tribune; 1993 Nov 15-17, 19, 23; ():1-47. PubMed ID: 11647013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]