These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17346021)

  • 1. How accurate are RGNs in grading pressure ulcers?
    Briggs SL
    Br J Nurs; 2006 Dec 14-2007 Jan 10; 15(22):1230-4. PubMed ID: 17346021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer grading.
    Moore Z
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Sep 7-13; 19(52):56-64; quiz 66. PubMed ID: 16163987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Senior nurses' control expectations and the development of pressure ulcers.
    Maylor M
    Nurs Stand; 2001 Jul 25-31; 15(45):33-7. PubMed ID: 12212386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing and grading pressure ulcers.
    Nurs Stand; 2000 May 3-9; 14(33):2p.. PubMed ID: 11975252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing nurses' ability to classify pressure ulcers correctly.
    Kelly J; Isted M
    Nurs Stand; 2011 Oct 19-25; 26(7):62, 64, 66 passim. PubMed ID: 23256259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) Training Program on Pressure Ulcers.
    Bergquist-Beringer S; Davidson J; Agosto C; Linde NK; Abel M; Spurling K; Dunton N; Christopher A
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2009 Jun; 40(6):252-8; quiz 259-60, 279. PubMed ID: 19639914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisite Web-based training in using the Braden Scale to predict pressure sore risk.
    Magnan MA; Maklebust J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Mar; 21(3):124-33. PubMed ID: 18388667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure ulcer grading tools: how reliable are they?
    Sharp A
    J Wound Care; 2004 Feb; 13(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 14999993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observations of nurses' treatment of leg and foot ulcers in community health care.
    Ribu E; Haram R; Rustøen T
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2003 Nov; 30(6):342-50. PubMed ID: 14615765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.
    Magnan MA; Maklebust J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure ulcer prevention: evaluation of an education programme for Swedish nurses.
    Gunningberg L
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 15045800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers.
    Bethell E
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jan; 12(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12572234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating staff knowledge of safeguarding and pressure ulcers in care homes.
    Ousey K; Kaye V; McCormick K; Stephenson J
    J Wound Care; 2016 Jan; 25(1):5-6, 8-11. PubMed ID: 26762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and quality in the nursing documentation of pressure ulcers: a comparison of record content and patient examination.
    Gunningberg L; Ehrenberg A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(6):328-35. PubMed ID: 15867708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of nurses' knowledge and practice in prevention and management of deep tissue injury and stage I pressure ulcer.
    Aydin AK; Karadağ A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(5):487-94. PubMed ID: 20736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-rater reliability and Waterlow's pressure ulcer risk assessment tool.
    Kelly J
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Apr 20-26; 19(32):86-7, 90-2. PubMed ID: 15875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck MH; De Bacquer D; Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.